The real annoying thing about Opus 4.6/Codex 5.3 is that it’s impossible to publicly say “Opus 4.5 (and the models that came after it) are an order of magnitude better than coding LLMs released just months before it” without sounding like an AI hype booster clickbaiting, but it’s the counterintuitive truth to my personal frustration. I have been trying to break this damn model by giving it complex tasks that would take me months to do by myself despite my coding pedigree but Opus and Codex keep doing them correctly. On Hacker News I was accused of said clickbaiting when making a similar statement with accusations of “I haven’t had success with Opus 4.5 so you must be lying.” The remedy to this skepticism is to provide more evidence in addition to greater checks and balances, but what can you do if people refuse to believe your evidence?
* @param arr 待排序数组
，推荐阅读爱思助手下载最新版本获取更多信息
Samsung Galaxy S26
第四十二条 从事涉及国家秘密的原子能研究、开发和利用活动的单位，应当依法建立健全保密管理制度，完善保密防护措施，开展保密宣传教育，加强保密监督检查。